posted on 2008-01-01, 00:00authored byM Pearson, J Cumming, Terry EvansTerry Evans, Peter Macauley, Kevin Ryland
Although there is general agreement that diversity is a feature of doctoral education in Australia, there are various forms and levels of diversity, many of which are not captured by analyses that rely on categories for analysing the doctoral education population that are those commonly used in education at the undergraduate level, such as sex, age, mode of study, type of enrolment, citizenship, and Broad Field of Study, etc. These categories primarily reflect concerns to do with funding and issues of participation and equity. Our analysis of data from a national survey of doctoral candidates carried out in 2005 as part of a Linkage Grant project “Reconceptualising the doctoral experience’, suggests that not all of these categories are relevant to critical concerns for doctoral education. Nor do analyses at a macro-level represent the particularity of the doctoral experience. They can mask the reality of a highly variable student population, and one that is not necessarily represented accurately or helpfully by ascribing group identities.
History
Pagination
90 - 114
Location
Adelaide, S.Aust.
Open access
Yes
Start date
2008-04-17
End date
2008-04-18
Language
eng
Notes
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in Deakin Research Online. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au
Publication classification
E2 Full written paper - non-refereed / Abstract reviewed
Copyright notice
2008, Quality in Postgraduate Research
Title of proceedings
QPR 2008 : Quality in Postgraduate Research Conference : Research education in the new global environment