Despite the continuous countermeasuring efforts, embedding malware in PDF documents and using it as a malware distribution mechanism is still a threat. This is due to its popularity as a document exchange format, the lack of user awareness of its dangers, as well as its ability to carry and execute malware. Several malicious PDF detection tools have been proposed by the academic community to address the PDF threat. All of which suffer some drawbacks that limit its utility. In this paper, we present the drawbacks of the current state of the art malicious PDF detectors. This was achieved by undertaking a survey of all recent malicious PDF detectors, followed by a comparative evaluation of the available tools. Our results show that Concept drifts is major drawback to the detectors, despite the fact that many detectors use machine learning approaches.