We identify an argument to be the basic unit of reasoning of a system that supports the construction of arguments and drafting of determinations in refugee law. Collaboration with the Refugee Review Tribunal of Australia has led to the development of a framework for argument construction that includes over 200 generic arguments. However, these arguments may not encompass all arguments used in any particular case. The construction of non-generic arguments involves the integration of information retrieval within reasoning. This retrieval is passage based from a wide variety of text sources. The framework also acts as the illocutionary structure in a document drafting process. in conceptualizing this system we have found it useful to propose a classification of knowledge based systems in law.
History
Pagination
117-125
Location
Oslo, Norway
Start date
1999-06-14
End date
1999-06-17
Publication classification
EN.1 Other conference paper
Title of proceedings
Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law