posted on 2006-01-01, 00:00authored byStuart Palmer, W Hall
Engineers Australia is the Australian professional body that accredits undergraduate engineering programs. It espouses an ‘outcomes-based’ program accreditation philosophy, but imposes mandatory ‘process’ requirements for off-campus programs that are in addition to the requirements for conventional on-campus programs. The focus on off-campus engineering study raises the question: how can learning outcomes, regardless of mode of study, be effectively measured? The current answer appears to be ‘graduate attributes’. The literature reveals a range of sophistication in approach to graduate attributes from identifying desirable graduate attributes, through to evidence-based certification of individual student attainment of graduate attributes. Many engineering accrediting bodies around the world identify student portfolios as a strategy for demonstrating student attainment of graduate attributes. The increasing use of online technology by students and educators alike, including as part of assessment, means that many of the reported applications of student portfolios are online portfolios. The effectiveness of online student portfolios will depend on them being embedded in day-to-day educational practice, rather than being an optional extra given a low priority by busy students. This paper presents a survey of the related literature and briefly outlines a project in progress at Deakin University to trial an online student portfolio.
History
Pagination
623 - 632
Location
Sydney, N.S.W.
Open access
Yes
Start date
2006-12-03
End date
2006-12-06
Language
eng
Publication classification
E1 Full written paper - refereed
Copyright notice
2006, ASCILITE
Editor/Contributor(s)
L Markauskaite, P Goodyear, P Reimann
Title of proceedings
ASCILITE 2006 : Who's learning? Whose technology? The 23rd Annual conference of the Australasian Society of Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education