File(s) under permanent embargo
Public art and resilience
conference contribution
posted on 2017-01-01, 00:00 authored by Cameron BishopCameron Bishop, David CrossDavid CrossThis paper will examine how university art and design education can engage
productively and profoundly with community. Taking as its key case study the
Treatment Public Art project developed by Deakin University in tandem with
Melbourne Water and the City of Wyndham in Melbourne’s west in 2015 and 2017,
this study will outline the assorted ways in which profound and ongoing dialogue and
collaboration with a specific community and its varied constituencies can, and
should, be core business of tertiary creative arts study. It will argue that such a pandisciplinary
partnership model not only provides professional practice pathways for
students, but achieves a social and cultural value that meshes research, teaching
and community-building in mutually beneficial ways.
As a riposte to the often erroneous, if persistent, accusation that art and design
education does not prepare students for ‘real world’ encounters and engagement, the
Treatment project has sought to build cultural resilience through dialogue, creative
expression and collaboration. This paper will examine how such a project serves to
build a complex skillset in students that combines dexterity across art making,
curatorial practice, project management and socially-engaged community
engagement strategies.
productively and profoundly with community. Taking as its key case study the
Treatment Public Art project developed by Deakin University in tandem with
Melbourne Water and the City of Wyndham in Melbourne’s west in 2015 and 2017,
this study will outline the assorted ways in which profound and ongoing dialogue and
collaboration with a specific community and its varied constituencies can, and
should, be core business of tertiary creative arts study. It will argue that such a pandisciplinary
partnership model not only provides professional practice pathways for
students, but achieves a social and cultural value that meshes research, teaching
and community-building in mutually beneficial ways.
As a riposte to the often erroneous, if persistent, accusation that art and design
education does not prepare students for ‘real world’ encounters and engagement, the
Treatment project has sought to build cultural resilience through dialogue, creative
expression and collaboration. This paper will examine how such a project serves to
build a complex skillset in students that combines dexterity across art making,
curatorial practice, project management and socially-engaged community
engagement strategies.
History
Event
Australian Council of University Art and Design Schools. Conference (2017 : Acton, A.C.T.)Pagination
1 - 10Publisher
ACUADSLocation
Acton, A.C.T.Place of publication
St Acton, A.C.T.Start date
2017-09-28End date
2017-09-29Language
engPublication classification
E1 Full written paper - refereedCopyright notice
2017, Cameron Bishop & David CrossEditor/Contributor(s)
[Unknown]Title of proceedings
ACUADS 2017 : Value : Proceedings of the ACUADS 2017 ConferenceUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedLicence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC