File(s) under permanent embargo
Publication bias in industrial relations research
conference contribution
posted on 2003-01-01, 00:00 authored by Chris DoucouliagosChris Doucouliagos, P LarochePublication bias arises when statistically non-significant results are suppressed or when only results satisfying prior expectations are published. Like most fields, research in industrial relations is vulnerable to publication bias. In this paper qualitative and quantitative techniques are used in order to detect publication bias in the union-productivity effects literature. We find no evidence of publication bias in this literature, although there does appear to be autoregression in the published results.
History
Title of proceedings
Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and new ZealandEvent
Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand. Conference (2003 : Clayton, Victoria)Series
AIRAANZ ConferencesPublisher
Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand (AIRAANZ)Location
Clayton, VictoriaPlace of publication
Waikato, NZStart date
2003-02-04End date
2003-02-07ISBN-10
0732622425Language
engPublication classification
E1 Full written paper - refereedCopyright notice
2003, Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand (AIRAANZ)Editor/Contributor(s)
J TetcherUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC