Reliability of coding of published behaviour change interventions: How can we decide if a technique is effective if we cannot agree what it is?

Johnston, Marie; Richardson, Michelle; Abraham, Charles; Francis, Jill; Hardeman, Wendy; Eccles, Martin; Wood, Caroline; Michie, Susan

File(s) not publicly available

Reliability of coding of published behaviour change interventions: How can we decide if a technique is effective if we cannot agree what it is?

conference contribution

posted on 2022-11-02, 23:56 authored by Marie Johnston, Michelle Richardson, Charles AbrahamCharles Abraham, Jill Francis, Wendy Hardeman, Martin Eccles, Caroline Wood, Susan Michie

Reliability of coding of published behaviour change interventions: How can we decide if a technique is effective if we cannot agree what it is?

History

Volume

28

Pagination

51-51

ISSN

0887-0446

Language

English

Author URL

https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000322613800119&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=a045e4b2bb1f2b747c68c720ec8913b7

Publication classification

E3.1 Extract of paper

Title of proceedings

PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD

Usage metrics

Keywords

Science & Technology Social Sciences Life Sciences & Biomedicine Public, Environmental & Occupational Health Psychology, Multidisciplinary Psychology

Licence

Exports

RefWorks

BibTeX

Ref. manager

Endnote

DataCite

NLM

DC

File(s) not publicly available

Reliability of coding of published behaviour change interventions: How can we decide if a technique is effective if we cannot agree what it is?

History

Volume

Pagination

ISSN

Language

Author URL

Publication classification

Title of proceedings

Publisher

Usage metrics

Categories

Keywords

Licence

Exports