posted on 2005-01-01, 00:00authored byM Herring, Georgina Kelly, J Mardel, Bronwyn Fox
The surface finishes of laminates produced by Quickstep™ and autoclave processes for use in automotive outer skin panels were compared. Automotive quality, painted carbon fibre samples, manufactured via both processes, were exposed to typical exposure environments including combinations of temperature (70, 120, 170°C), UV-B, humidity (95% RH) and immersion in water.<br><br>The microscopy and surface roughness results demonstrated that the surfaces produced by the Quickstep process were less susceptible to damage in the aging environments than the surfaces of the autoclaved samples. Quickstep samples displayed surface bubbling of only 5 μm, compared to the autoclaved surface bubbles which reached a diameter of 30 mm before bursting, with complete delamination occurring between the paint and the composite. The surface roughness measurements revealed the autoclave samples (Ra = 0.72 μm) were up to three times the roughness of the Quickstep samples (Ra = 0.23 μm).<br>
History
Location
Paris, France
Open access
Yes
Language
eng
Notes
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in Deakin Research Online. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au
Publication classification
E1.1 Full written paper - refereed; E Conference publication
Copyright notice
2005, SAMPE Europe
Pagination
220 - 225
Start date
2005-04-05
End date
2005-04-07
ISBN-13
9783952267738
ISBN-10
3952267732
Title of proceedings
SAMPE Europe 2005 : Proceedings of the 26th International SAMPE Europe Conference 2005