4CMenB Breadth of Immune Response, Immunogenicity, and Safety: Results from a Phase 3 Randomized, Controlled, Observer Blind Study in Adolescents and Young Adults
posted on 2025-01-14, 00:34authored byT Nolan, C Bhusal, J Beran, M Bloch, BS Cetin, EC Dinleyici, D Dražan, S Kokko, S Koski, O Laajalahti, JM Langley, M Rämet, PC Richmond, P Silas, B Tapiero, F Tiong, M Tipton, B Ukkonen, B Ulukol, M Lattanzi, M Trapani, A Willemsen, D Toneatto, R Ackerman, R Adamovska, Eugene AthanEugene Athan, K Ayesu, D Bernard, W Byars, R Carter, B Cetin, M Chakerian, M Dalebout, F De Looze, M Dionne, P Dzongowski, R Farjo, D Finn, G Freeman, R Gottfredson, P Grubb, A Gupta, T Ince, R Jeanfreau, J Jones, J Kellner, K Kiiroja, J Langley, I Lechevin, H Mehta, S Meisalu, D Morelle, A Osowa, P Paavola, M Patel, M Pavlasek, E Pelayo, S Raulier, P Richmond, W Rok, R Rouhbakhsh, M Sadarangani, Y Sanchez, M Schear, J Scott, I Seppä, W Simon, M Spaziererova, J Staben, J Surber, ML Vachon, N Vale, D Wauters, J Zemanek
Abstract
Background
Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) strains are highly diverse. Breadth of immune response for the MenB vaccine, 4CMenB, administered at 0–2, 0–6, or 0–2–6 months, was demonstrated by endogenous complement-human serum bactericidal antibody (enc-hSBA) assay against an epidemiologically relevant panel of 110 MenB strains.
Methods
In a phase 3 trial, 3651 healthy 10- to 25-year-old participants were randomized 5:5:9:1 to receive 4CMenB (0–6 schedule), 4CMenB (0–2–6 schedule), investigational MenABCWY vaccine, or control MenACWY-CRM vaccine. The primary objectives were to evaluate safety and demonstrate breadth of immune response by enc-hSBA assay against the MenB strain panel using test-based (percentage of samples without bactericidal activity against strains after 4CMenB vs control vaccination) and responder-based (percentage of participants whose postvaccination sera kill ≥70% strains) approaches. Success was demonstrated with 2-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) lower limit >65%. Immunogenicity was assessed by traditional hSBA assay against four indicator strains.
Results
Breadth of immune response (test-based) was 78.7% (97.5% CI, 77.2–80.1), 81.8% (80.4–83.1), 83.2% (81.9–84.4) for the 0–2, 0–6, and 0–2–6 schedules, respectively, and (responder-based) 84.8% (81.8–87.5), 89.8% (87.2–92.0), and 93.4% (91.2–95.2), respectively. No clinically relevant differences in immunogenicity were observed across schedules. 4CMenB was well tolerated.
Conclusions
The 2-dose (0–2, 0–6) 4CMenB schedules met predefined criteria for success for both breadth of immune response endpoints against a diverse MenB strain panel, had comparable immunogenicity, and safety in line with the established 4CMenB safety profile. The 3-dose schedule provided no additional immunological benefit, supporting use of the 4CMenB 0–2 schedule.