Deakin University
Browse

A Guided Self-Determination Intervention vs. an Attention Control Group of People with Type 2 Diabetes in an Outpatient Clinic Setting-A Randomised Clinical Trial

journal contribution
posted on 2025-10-01, 05:52 authored by Anne S Mathiesen, Vibeke Zoffmann, Markus Harboe Olsen, Janus C Jakobsen, Emilie HS Marqvorsen, Jane Lindschou, Bodil RasmussenBodil Rasmussen, Christian Gluud, Mette Juel D Rothmann
Introduction and Objective: Evidence suggests that the autonomy supportive intervention, the guided self-determination method (GSD), may reduce diabetes distress in people with type 1 diabetes. The objective was to determine the benefits and harms of a GSD intervention versus an attention control group in adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods: The design was a pragmatic, dual-centre, randomised, assessor-blinded, superiority clinical trial of adults (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes. The participants were randomly assigned to GSD versus attention control group, both groups provided face-to-face or over video. The primary outcome was diabetes distress assessed with the Problem Areas in Diabetes questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were depressive symptoms assessed with Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale; quality of life assessed with SF-36; and non-serious adverse events assessed with the Negative Effects Questionnaire at baseline and 5- and 12-months follow-up. Results: The trial included 150 participants (GSD n=76 versus attention control n=74). This was below our predefined sample size and thresholds for statistical significance were adjusted accordingly. Linear regression showed evidence of beneficial effects of GSD on diabetes distress (MD -5.83; 98.75% CI -11.26;-0.41, p=0.007) and depression (MD -2.77; 98.75% CI -5.24;-0.30, p=0.005). Linear regression showed evidence of a beneficial effect of attention control on quality of life (mental component) (MD 8.10; 98.75% CI 0.94;15.27, p=0.005) but no difference on the physical component (MD 1.79; 98.75% CI -5.72;9.31) or adverse events (MD 0.00; 98.75% Hodges-Lehmann CI 0.00;0.00). Conclusion: The GSD intervention versus attention control seems to reduce diabetes distress and depression. Attention control may improve quality of life. Disclosure A.S. Mathiesen: None. V. Zoffmann: None. M. Olsen: None. J.C. Jakobsen: None. E.H.S. Marqvorsen: None. J. Lindschou: None. B. Rasmussen: None. C. Gluud: None. M.D. Rothmann: None. Funding The Novo Nordisk Foundation, Steno Collaborative Grant (NNF10OC0057720)

Funding

The Novo Nordisk Foundation, Steno Collaborative Grant (NNF10OC0057720)

Funder: Novo Nordisk Foundation

Funder: Steno Collaborative Grant | Grant ID: NNF10OC0057720

History

Related Materials

  1. 1.

Location

IL, Chicago

Language

English

Journal

DIABETES

Volume

74

Article number

667-P

ISSN

0012-1797

eISSN

1939-327X

Issue

Supplement_1

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC