Deakin University
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

A bibliographic review of public health dissemination and implementation research output and citation rates

journal contribution
posted on 2023-02-15, 00:01 authored by L Wolfenden, AJ Milat, C Lecathelinais, E Skelton, T Clinton-McHarg, C Williams, J Wiggers, LK Chai, Serene YoongSerene Yoong
The aim of this study was to describe the research output and citation rates (academic impact) of public health dissemination and implementation research according to research design and study type. A cross sectional bibliographic study was undertaken in 2013. All original data-based studies and review articles focusing on dissemination and implementation research that had been published in 10 randomly selected public health journals in 2008 were audited. The electronic database ‘Scopus’ was used to calculate 5-year citation rates for all included publications. Of the 1648 publications examined, 216 were original data-based research or literature reviews focusing on dissemination and implementation research. Of these 72% were classified as descriptive/epidemiological, 26% were intervention and just 1.9% were measurement research. Cross-sectional studies were the most common study design (47%). Reviews, randomized trials, non-randomized trials and decision/cost-effectiveness studies each represented between 6 and 10% of all output. Systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were the most frequently cited study designs. The study suggests that publications that had the greatest academic impact (highest citation rates) made up only a small proportion of overall public health dissemination and implementation research output.

History

Journal

Preventive Medicine Reports

Volume

4

Pagination

441-443

Location

United States

ISSN

2211-3355

eISSN

2211-3355

Language

en

Publisher

Elsevier BV