File(s) under permanent embargo
A comparison of interfacial testing methods and sensitivities to carbon fiber surface treatment conditions
journal contribution
posted on 2019-03-01, 00:00 authored by Filip Stojcevski, Tim HilditchTim Hilditch, Luke HendersonLuke Henderson© 2019 Studies show surface treatments improve interfacial adhesion of carbon fiber composites however little research examines the translatability of interfacial shear strength (IFSS) across testing scales. How surface treatments may influence IFSS translatability is also unclear. Investigation of this relationship is important to compare results between commonly used test methodologies. This paper evaluates the translatability and sensitivity of IFSS across micro-, meso- and macro-scale testing protocols. Tests investigated were single fiber fragmentation (SFFT), Iosipescu and short beam shear (SBS) testing. Twelve pristine fibers were produced using a combination of three electrochemical oxidation amperages (0 A, 2 A and 3.4 A) and four sizing ratios (unsized, 1:10, 1:15 and 1:20 parts epoxy:water). Results show differences between micro, meso and macroscale IFSS, especially for unsized fibers and when sizing emulsion ratio is the independent variable. As oxidation amperage and sizing levels were increased, the disparity in IFSS values across testing scales decreased.
History
Journal
Composites Part A: Applied Science and ManufacturingVolume
118Pagination
293 - 301Publisher
ElsevierLocation
Amsterdam, The NetherlandsPublisher DOI
ISSN
1359-835XLanguage
engPublication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalUsage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Carbon fibresFibre\/matrix bondInterface\/interphaseMechanical testingInterfacial adhesionScience & TechnologyTechnologyEngineering, ManufacturingMaterials Science, CompositesEngineeringMaterials ScienceSHEAR TESTMATRIX ADHESIONELECTROCHEMICAL OXIDATIONPOLYMER COMPOSITESIOSIPESCU SPECIMENSTRENGTHPROPERTYAerospace EngineeringMechanical Engineering