Deakin University
Browse

A comparison of self-reported puberty using the Pubertal Development Scale and the Sexual Maturation Scale in a school-based epidemiologic survey

Version 2 2025-05-20, 21:00
Version 1 2014-10-27, 16:50
journal contribution
posted on 2025-05-20, 21:00 authored by L Bond, J Clements, N Bertalli, Tracy Evans-WhippTracy Evans-Whipp, BJ McMorris, GC Patton, John ToumbourouJohn Toumbourou, RF Catalano
ABSTRACTPurposeTo examine concordance between two self‐reported measures of puberty: Sexual Maturation Scale (SMS) and Pubertal Development Scale (PDS) and their acceptability to adolescents.MethodsParticipants of a school‐based study in grades 5, 7 and 9 were classified into one of 5 pubertal stages using each method.Results2864 students (age 9–16 years) participated. Agreement was moderate for males ( 0.42, 95% CI 0.39, 0.45) and females ( 0.57, 95% CI 0.53, 0.61). Concordance within one stage was excellent (females 97%, males 89%), with discrepancies due to females being classified one stage later on the PDS (26%) and males one stage earlier (32%). There were more missing data for the SMS (13%) than the PDS (4%).ConclusionsGiven the level of concordance and difficulties of using the drawings in a school‐based survey, we would recommend the PDS as an alternative to assess pubertal status in epidemiological studies.

History

Journal

Journal of Adolescence

Volume

29

Pagination

709-720

Location

London, England

ISSN

0140-1971

eISSN

1095-9254

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2005, Academic Press

Issue

5

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC