Deakin University

File(s) under permanent embargo

Accountability structures and management relationships of internal audit

Version 2 2024-06-03, 07:55
Version 1 2014-10-28, 09:27
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-03, 07:55 authored by P Leung, Barry CooperBarry Cooper, L Perera
Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine the accountability structures and the management relationships of internal audit. In particular, related issues such as the predominant internal audit objectives and the related functions, the extent to which internal audit addresses any financial reporting risks and the manner in which internal auditors in Australia perform their tasks, are identified. The study also looks at the extent of compliance with the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) Standards. Design/methodology/approach - Based on a survey of the chief audit executives in Australia, the study identifies the reporting mechanisms, functions and relationships of internal audit, including the contributions made towards good corporate governance. There is, however, some misalignment between the aspirations of internal auditors and their relationships with management. Findings - While internal audit objectives have been established with a focus on controls, risks and governance, the study has highlighted the fact that there is a lack of correlation between the tasks performed by internal auditors and the important internal audit objectives, with the exception of internal control and risks. The results also suggest that internal auditors have been providing an internal consulting and advisory role in matters concerning IT systems, strategic risks and financial issues. If internal auditors are to proactively contribute to good corporate governance, they need to define how, and in what way, this can be done. In regard to corporate governance processes, the results of the research indicate that issues surrounding internal control, risk assessment and management processes are regarded as the key factors for internal audit to contribute to good corporate governance. Originality/value - This study complements and contributes to the existing literature in providing insights into the evolving role of the internal audit function in terms of accountabilities and relationships with management. It also provides a valuable insight into how the internal audit profession can build upon its inherent strengths and address any apparent areas of concern. This will assist both the profession and policy makers alike, in better understanding and improving the role of the internal audit process.



Managerial Auditing Journal






Bingley, England








Name - Institute of Internal Auditors Copyright - Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2011 Last updated - 2011-10-27 SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Australia 1. Baker, N. (2007), "Tomorrow's internal auditor CBOK: a special report", Internal Auditor, Vol. 12, pp. 44-50. 2. Brody, R.G. and Lowe, D.J. (2000), "The new role of the internal auditor: implications for internal auditor objectivity", International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 169-76. 3. Burnaby, P. and Hass, S. (2009), "A summary of the global common body of knowledge 2006 (CBOK) study in internal auditing", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 22 No. 9, pp. 813-34. 4. Colbert, J.L. (2002), "Corporate governance: communications from internal and external auditors", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 147-52. 5. Cooper, B.J. and Craig, J. (1983), A Profile of Internal Audit in Australia, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne. 6. Cooper, B.J., Leung, P. and Mathews, C. (1994), "Internal audit: an Australian profile", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 13-19. 7. Cooper, B.J., Leung, P. and Mathews, C. (1996), "Benchmarking - a comparison of internal audit in Australia, Malaysia and Hong Kong", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 23-9. 8. Cooper, B., Leung, P. and Wong, G. (2006), "The Asia Pacific literature review on internal auditing", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 21 No. 8, pp. 822-34. 9. Coram, P., Ferguson, C. and Moroney, R. (2008), "Internal audit, alternative audit structures and the level of misappropriation of assets fraud", Accounting and Finance, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 543-59. 10. Church, B.K., McMillan, J.J. and Schneider, A. (2001), "Factors affecting internal auditors' consideration of fraudulent financial reporting during analytical procedures", Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 20, pp. 65-80. 11. Gendron, Y. and Bedard, J. (2006), "On the constitution of audit committee effectiveness", Accounting, Organisations and Society, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 211-39. 12. Glascock, K.L. (2002), "Auditees or clients?", The Internal Auditor, Vol. 59 No. 4, pp. 84-5. 13. Goodwin-Stewart, J. and Kent, P. (2006), "The use of internal audit by Australian companies", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 81-101. 14. Hass, S., Abdolmohammadi, M.J. and Burnaby, P. (2006), "The Americas literature review on internal auditing", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 21 No. 8, pp. 835-44. 15. Hermanson, D.R., Carcello, J.V. and Raghunandan, K. (2005), "Changes in internal auditing during the time of the major US accounting scandals", International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 117-27. 16. James, K. (2003), "The effects of internal audit structure on perceived financial statement fraud prevention", Accounting Horizons, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 315-27. 17. Leung, P., Cooper, B.J. and Robertson, P. (2004), The Role of Internal Audit in Corporate Governance & Management, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne. 18. Zain, M.M. and Subramaniam, N. (2007), "Internal auditor perceptions on audit committee interactions: a qualitative study in Malaysian public corporations", Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 894-908. 19. McCall, S.M. (2002), "The auditor as consultant", The Internal Auditor, Vol. 59 No. 6, pp. 35-9. 20. Norman, C.S., Rose, A.M. and Rose, J.M. (2010), "Internal audit reporting lines, fraud risk decomposition and assessments of fraud risk", Accounting, Organisations and Society, Vol. 35, pp. 546-57. 21. Owen, J. (2003), Report of the HIH Royal Commission, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. 22. Paape, L., Scheffe, J. and Snoep, P. (2003), "The relationship between the internal audit function and corporate governance in the EU - a survey", International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 247-62. 23. PwC (2006), PricewaterhouseCoopers' State of the Internal Audit Profession: Internal Audit Post Sarbanes-Oxley, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, New York, NY. 24. Sarens, G. and de Beelde, I. (2006), "Internal auditors' perception about their role in risk management: a comparison between US and Belgian companies", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 63-80. 25. Sarens, G., De Beelde, I. and Everaert, P. (2009), "Internal audit: a comfort provider to the audit committee", The British Accounting Review, Vol. 41, pp. 90-106. 26. SOX (2002), "Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002", paper presented at One Hundred Seventh Congress HR 3763, Washington, DC. 27. Spira, L.F. and Page, M. (2003), "Risk management: the reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 640-61. 28. Stewart, J. and Subramanium, N. (2010), "Internal audit independence and objectivity: emerging research opportunities", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 328-60. 29. IIA (2009), International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF). Performance Standard 2100 Nature of Work; S

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2011, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.




Emerald Group Publishing, Limited

Place of publication