Deakin University
Browse
1/1
2 files

An 11-country study to benchmark the implementation of recommended nutrition policies by national governments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index, 2015-2018

Version 2 2024-06-06, 09:07
Version 1 2019-01-30, 15:35
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-06, 09:07 authored by S Vandevijvere, S Barquera, G Caceres, C Corvalan, T Karupaiah, MF Kroker-Lobos, M L'Abbé, SH Ng, S Phulkerd, M Ramirez-Zea, SA Rebello, M Reyes, Gary SacksGary Sacks, CM Sánchez Nóchez, K Sanchez, D Sanders, M Spires, R Swart, V Tangcharoensathien, Z Tay, A Taylor, L Tolentino-Mayo, R Van Dam, L Vanderlee, F Watson, C Whitton, B Swinburn
The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) aims to assess the extent of implementation of recommended food environment policies by governments compared with international best practices and prioritize actions to fill implementation gaps. The Food-EPI was applied in 11 countries across six regions (2015-2018). National public health nutrition panels (n = 11-101 experts) rated the extent of implementation of 47 policy and infrastructure support good practice indicators by their government(s) against best practices, using an evidence document verified by government officials. Experts identified and prioritized actions to address implementation gaps. The proportion of indicators at "very low if any," "low," "medium," and "high" implementation, overall Food-EPI scores, and priority action areas were compared across countries. Inter-rater reliability was good (GwetAC2 = 0.6-0.8). Chile had the highest proportion of policies (13%) rated at "high" implementation, while Guatemala had the highest proportion of policies (83%) rated at "very low if any" implementation. The overall Food-EPI score was "medium" for Australia, England, Chile, and Singapore, while "very low if any" for Guatemala. Policy areas most frequently prioritized included taxes on unhealthy foods, restricting unhealthy food promotion and front-of-pack labelling. The Food-EPI was found to be a robust tool and process to benchmark governments' progress to create healthy food environments.

History

Journal

Obesity Reviews

Volume

20

Season

Supplement: Future Directions in Obesity Prevention

Pagination

57-66

Location

England

Open access

  • Yes

ISSN

1467-7881

eISSN

1467-789X

Language

English

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2019, World Obesity Federation

Issue

S2

Publisher

WILEY