Deakin University
Browse

An international estimate of the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities

Download (2.92 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-10-30, 01:28 authored by David J Wright, Matthew W Scott, Sarah N Kraeutner, Pamela Barhoun, Maurizio Bertollo, Mark J Campbell, Baptiste M Waltzing, Stephan F Dahm, Maaike Esselaar, Cornelia Frank, Robert M Hardwick, Ian FuelscherIan Fuelscher, Ben Marshall, Nicola J Hodges, Christian HydeChristian Hyde, Paul S Holmes
The aim of this research was to establish prevalence estimates for aphantasia, hypophantasia, typical imagery ability, and hyperphantasia in a large multi-national cohort. In Study 1, the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire was completed by 3,049 participants. Results indicated prevalence estimates of 1.2% for aphantasia, 3% for hypophantasia, 89.9% for typical imagery ability, and 5.9% for hyperphantasia. In Study 2, to replicate these findings in a larger sample, the Study 1 data were combined with openly available data from previous prevalence studies to create a total sample of 9,063 participants. Re-analysis of this data confirmed prevalence estimates of 0.9% for aphantasia, 3.3% for hypophantasia, 89.7% for typical imagery ability, and 6.1% for hyperphantasia. These robust and up-to-date estimates provide enhanced clarity to researchers regarding the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities and provide a platform for future studies exploring the role of visual imagery in various cognitive and behavioral tasks.

History

Journal

Frontiers in Psychology

Volume

15

Pagination

1-12

Location

Lausanne, Switzerland

ISSN

1664-1078

eISSN

1664-1078

Language

eng

Notes

Source info: CONCOG-D-24-00062

Publisher

Frontiers Media

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC