Deakin University
Browse
livingstone-applicationofdried-2016.pdf (702.33 kB)

Application of dried blood spots to determine Vitamin D status in a large nutritional study with unsupervised sampling: The Food4Me project

Download (702.33 kB)
Version 2 2024-06-04, 06:09
Version 1 2016-04-21, 16:28
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-04, 06:09 authored by U Hoeller, M Baur, FF Roos, L Brennan, H Daniel, R Fallaize, H Forster, ER Gibney, M Gibney, M Godlewska, K Hartwig, S Kolossa, CP Lambrinou, Katherine LivingstoneKatherine Livingstone, JA Lovegrove, AL Macready, Y Manios, CFM Marsaux, JA Martinez, C Celis-Morales, G Moschonis, S Navas-Carretero, CB O'Donovan, R San-Cristobal, WHM Saris, A Surwillo, I Traczyk, L Tsirigoti, MC Walsh, C Woolhead, JC Mathers, P Weber
AbstractAn efficient and robust method to measure vitamin D (25-hydroxy vitamin D3(25(OH)D3) and 25-hydroxy vitamin D2in dried blood spots (DBS) has been developed and applied in the pan-European multi-centre, internet-based, personalised nutrition intervention study Food4Me. The method includes calibration with blood containing endogenous 25(OH)D3, spotted as DBS and corrected for haematocrit content. The methodology was validated following international standards. The performance characteristics did not reach those of the current gold standard liquid chromatography-MS/MS in plasma for all parameters, but were found to be very suitable for status-level determination under field conditions. DBS sample quality was very high, and 3778 measurements of 25(OH)D3were obtained from 1465 participants. The study centre and the season within the study centre were very good predictors of 25(OH)D3levels (P<0·001 for each case). Seasonal effects were modelled by fitting a sine function with a minimum 25(OH)D3level on 20 January and a maximum on 21 July. The seasonal amplitude varied from centre to centre. The largest difference between winter and summer levels was found in Germany and the smallest in Poland. The model was cross-validated to determine the consistency of the predictions and the performance of the DBS method. The Pearson’s correlation between the measured values and the predicted values wasr0·65, and thesdof their differences was 21·2 nmol/l. This includes the analytical variation and the biological variation within subjects. Overall, DBS obtained by unsupervised sampling of the participants at home was a viable methodology for obtaining vitamin D status information in a large nutritional study.

History

Journal

British Journal of Nutrition

Volume

115

Pagination

202-211

Location

England

Open access

  • Yes

ISSN

0007-1145

eISSN

1475-2662

Language

English

Publication classification

C Journal article, C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2015, The Authors

Issue

2

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS