Are food brands that carry light claims different?
Version 2 2024-06-13, 08:56Version 2 2024-06-13, 08:56
Version 1 2015-03-04, 13:46Version 1 2015-03-04, 13:46
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-13, 08:56 authored by T Sjostrom, A Maria Corsi, C Driesener, P ChrysochouLittle is known about the market performance of brands that carry light claims (for example low fat, low sugar) in comparison to their regular counterparts. In order to fill this gap, we explore whether light brands perform similarly to regular brands in terms of (a) brand performance measures (BPMs), such as market share (MS) and penetration, (b) loyalty levels, and (c) customer sharing. We analyse three product categories (cola, flavoured carbonated beverages and margarine) using UK household panel data provided by Kantar. The results show that when considering standard BPMs (that is MS, penetration and purchase frequency), regular brands receive higher BPMs than light brands. However, when considering repeat purchase loyalty, light brands achieve greater levels of loyalty than their regular counterparts. Finally, light brands share their buyers more with each other than expected, suggesting the existence of market partitions, although these are not isolated as buyers of these brands still buy regular brands. © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
History
Journal
Journal of brand managementVolume
21Pagination
325-341Location
Basingstoke, EnglandPublisher DOI
ISSN
1350-231XeISSN
1479-1803Language
engPublication classification
C Journal article, C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2014, Palgrave MacmillanIssue
4Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC