Deakin University
Browse
mahony-aspirationalyet-post-2017.pdf (445.94 kB)

Aspirational yet precarious: compliance of New Zealand refugee settlement policy with international human rights obligations

Download (445.94 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2017-01-01, 00:00 authored by Christopher Mahony, J Marlowe, L Humpage, N Baird
New Zealand has ratified many of the same international instruments instructing resettled refugees' rights as other resettlement countries. However, New Zealand has adopted broad strategies with little policy specificity or funding to ensure settling refugees' rights are upheld. In examining selected rights, this article demonstrates that New Zealand refugee policy remains aspirational yet precarious in two main ways. First, refugee pathways to protection, via the UN quota system or as Convention refugees, significantly affect both settlement support and family reunification. Second, policy implementation is often inconsistent and, at times, discriminatory, because economic, social and cultural rights are inadequately embedded into New Zealand's human rights framework. It is thus difficult to claim that New Zealand consistently and sufficiently meets its international obligations, despite the aspirations articulated within New Zealand's recently developed Refugee Resettlement Strategy.

History

Journal

International journal of migration and border studies

Volume

3

Issue

1

Pagination

5 - 23

Publisher

Inderscience Publishers

Location

Olney, Eng.

ISSN

1755-2419

eISSN

1755-2427

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal; C Journal article

Copyright notice

2017, Inderscience Publishers

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC