Deakin University
Browse

Audit Office Effectiveness and Efficiency

journal contribution
posted on 2024-08-02, 00:55 authored by Eka TanEka Tan, Mukesh Garg, Debra Jeter, Dhayani Kirubaharan, Vic Naiker
SUMMARY Prior research suggests that audit offices charge fee premiums for delivering highly effective audits. However, effective audit offices may also be efficient, reducing costs incurred and resulting in savings being passed on to clients. This study documents a positive relation between the infrequency of Big-R restatements of financial statements across an audit office’s portfolio of publicly traded clients (which proxies for effectiveness) and lower audit fees (which proxies for efficiency), ceteris paribus. This finding, which is robust to tests of alternative explanations and a variety of measures and specifications, differs from conclusions in most prior studies that investigate the association between audit fees and perceived audit quality captured by metrics such as auditor industry specialization and office size. Overall, our results help inform investors and other stakeholders by providing evidence that contrasts with the conventional notion that higher audit fees necessarily reflect higher audit quality in the post-Sarbanes-Oxley Act era. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: M40; M41; M42.

History

Journal

Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory

Pagination

1-29

Location

Sarasota, Flo.

ISSN

0278-0380

eISSN

1558-7991

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC