This paper extends the literature on the role of political economy in fi- nancial reporting and auditing by testing two hypotheses. The first hypothesis predicts that there will be a greater increase in audit effort and audit fees for Malaysian firms with political connections, as a result of the Asian financial crisis, than for non-politically connected firms because these firms have a higher risk of financial misstatements. The second hypothesis predicts that the audit fees of politically connected firms will decline when capital controls are introduced by the government as a ploy to financially assist politically connected firms to rebound from the crisis, and thus reduces the risk of financial misstatements. The results show that there is a greater increase in audit fees for firms with political connections than for non-politically connected firms as a result of the Asian financial crisis. However, there is a decline in audit fees for politically connected firms after the capital controls are implemented.
History
Journal
Journal of accounting research
Volume
44
Pagination
931-963
Location
London, Eng.
ISSN
0021-8456
eISSN
1475-679X
Language
eng
Publication classification
C Journal article, C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice
2006, University of Chicago on behalf of the Institute of Professional Accounting