Deakin University
Browse

Author's Reply

Download (127.6 kB)
Version 2 2024-06-03, 23:04
Version 1 2020-03-01, 00:00
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-03, 23:04 authored by PP Pednekar, T Ágh, M Malmenäs, AD Raval, BM Bennett, BJ Borah, DS Hutchins, E Manias, AF Williams, M Hiligsmann, A Turcu-Stiolica, JE Zeber, L Abrahamyan, TJ Bunz, AM Peterson
We thank the editor for giving us the opportunity to respond to the letter to the editor regarding our recent publication on multiple medication adherence (MMA). 1 We also thank the authors of the letter to the editor for their interest in our paper and for providing their comments, as it validates the timeliness and importance of this topic and offers the opportunity for an ardent discussion, which we believe is a hallmark of good science. At issue, in this case, is the measurement of adherence that involves polytherapeutic regimens. Although it is a methodologically challenging endeavor, subject to multiple dimensions and varied opinions, we believe that as more patients experience numerous medical comorbidities and hence polypharmacy needs, additional insights and novel approaches will be required to better document adherence measures. One of our intentions in documenting currently utilized MMA methods in our systematic review was to support future insights and novel approaches that we believe will ultimately support the viewpoint that ability of adherence to predict and stimulate action should be the focus.

History

Related Materials

Location

New York, N.Y.

Open access

  • Yes

Language

eng

Publication classification

C2 Other contribution to refereed journal

Copyright notice

2019, ISPOR - Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research

Journal

Value in Health

Volume

23

Pagination

407-408

ISSN

1098-3015

eISSN

1524-4733

Issue

3

Publisher

Elsevier

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC