Automatic external defibrillators: changing the way we manage ventricular fibrillation
Version 2 2024-06-04, 06:20Version 2 2024-06-04, 06:20
Version 1 2017-07-17, 15:12Version 1 2017-07-17, 15:12
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-04, 06:20authored byKL Smith, PA Cameron, Anna PeetersAnna Peeters, ADM Meyer, JJ McNeil
OBJECTIVE: To discuss recent developments in automatic defibrillation and to review the evidence that first-responders equipped with automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) improve survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE search from 1966 to 1999 (articles in English only) and examination of bibliographies. STUDY SELECTION: Published studies of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and first-responders equipped with AEDs. Studies had to have a control group and to report survival to hospital discharge from ventricular fibrillation (VF). DATA EXTRACTION: Six studies met the selection criteria (two prospective randomised trials, two prospective controlled trials, and one cohort study and one retrospective study, both with historical controls). DATA SYNTHESIS: A random effects meta-analysis of odds ratios for survival from VF. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis suggests that equipping first-responders with AEDs increases the probability of survival to hospital discharge after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (odds ratio, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.27-2.38; P < 0.001). However, most of the studies lacked sufficient power to draw definitive conclusions. Until the impact of wide deployment of AEDs is fully understood, first-responder defibrillation in Australia should only occur as part of coordinated multicentre research studies.