File(s) under permanent embargo
Barriers to multiculturalism: In-group favoritism and out-group hostility are independently associated with policy opposition
Version 2 2024-06-03, 15:01Version 2 2024-06-03, 15:01
Version 1 2018-12-21, 16:37Version 1 2018-12-21, 16:37
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-03, 15:01 authored by R Perry, N Priest, Yin ParadiesYin Paradies, FK Barlow, CG Sibley© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017. Bias in favor of the in-group is a key determinant of discrimination and is thought to be largely independent of, and qualitatively distinct from, out-group hostility. One key difference, according to realistic conflict theory, is that in-group preferences become more closely associated with discrimination when intergroup threat is salient. The current study presents a direct comparison of the level of association of in-group favoritism and out-group hostility with opposition to multiculturalism policies in New Zealand. With both predictors operationalized as affect ratings of warmth and anger across separate models, in-group favoritism and out-group hostility were independently associated with European New Zealanders’ (N = 10,869) opposition to both resource-specific and symbolic policies. Furthermore, in-group favoritism was more strongly associated with opposition to resource-specific policies that represent high realistic threat (compared with symbolic policies). In contrast, out-group hostility was more consistently associated with both policy domains.
History
Journal
Social Psychological and Personality ScienceVolume
9Pagination
89-98Location
London, Eng.Publisher DOI
ISSN
1948-5506eISSN
1948-5514Language
engPublication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalIssue
1Publisher
SageUsage metrics
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC