ritchie-bayesiannetworks-2017.pdf (3.58 MB)
Bayesian networks elucidate interactions between fire and other drivers of terrestrial fauna distributions
journal contribution
posted on 2017-08-01, 00:00 authored by B A Hradsky, T D Penman, D Ababei, A Hanea, Euan RitchieEuan Ritchie, A York, J Di StefanoFire is a major driver of community composition and habitat structure and is extensively used as an ecological management tool in flammable landscapes. Interactions between fire and other processes that affect animal distributions, however, cause variation in faunal responses to fire and limit our ability to identify appropriate fire management regimes for biodiversity conservation. Bayesian networks (BNs) have not previously been used to examine terrestrial faunal distributions in relation to fire, but offer an alternative statistical framework for modeling complex environmental relationships as they explicitly capture interactions between predictor variables. We developed a conceptual model of the interactions between drivers of faunal distributions in fire-affected landscapes, and then used a non-parametric BN modeling approach to describe and quantify these relationships for a suite of terrestrial native mammal species. We also tested whether BNs could be used to predict these species' distributions using only remote-sensed or mapped variables. Data were collected at 113 sites across 47,000 ha of continuous eucalypt forest in the Otway Ranges, southeastern Australia; time-since-fire (TSF) ranged from six months to 74 yr. Habitat complexity increased with TSF and forest wetness. Critical-weight-range (35-5500 g) marsupials and rodents were generally more likely to occur at long unburnt sites with high habitat complexity, and in wetter forest types. In contrast, large grazers and browsers preferred less complex habitats and younger or drier forest. Species occurrences were more strongly affected by habitat complexity than TSF, coarse woody debris cover, or invasive predator (Vulpes vulpes or Felis catus) occurrence. Bayesian network models effectively discriminated between the presence and absence of most native mammal species, even when only provided with data on remote-sensed or mapped variables (i.e., without field-assessed data such as habitat complexity). Non-parametric BNs are an effective technique for explicitly modeling the complex and context - dependent influence of fire history on faunal distributions, and may reduce the need to collect extensive field data on habitat structure and other proximate drivers.
History
Journal
EcosphereVolume
8Issue
8Article number
e01926Pagination
1 - 19Publisher
John Wiley & SonsLocation
Chichester, Eng.Publisher DOI
Link to full text
eISSN
2150-8925Language
engPublication classification
C Journal article; C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2017, Hradsky et al.Usage metrics
Keywords
Australiacritical-weight-range mammaldisturbanceFelis cactusfire managementforesthabitat complexitynon-parametric Bayesian networkpredator-prey interactionspecies distribution (niche) modelVulpes vulpesScience & TechnologyLife Sciences & BiomedicineEcologyEnvironmental Sciences & EcologyFelis catusSOUTH-EASTERN AUSTRALIAHABITAT STRUCTUREBELIEF NETWORKSPRESCRIBED FIREBIODIVERSITY CONSERVATIONMICROHABITAT SELECTIONHERBIVORE DISTRIBUTIONAVIAN RESPONSESAFRICAN SAVANNAEXTINCTION RISKZoologyEcology
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC