Version 2 2024-06-16, 13:26Version 2 2024-06-16, 13:26
Version 1 2014-10-27, 16:25Version 1 2014-10-27, 16:25
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-16, 13:26authored byH Lofgren
In this paper I argue that factors such as conflicting pressures for food regulation reform and continuing industry assistance programs have made conditions even more favourable for collective business interest representation in Australia's food processing sector. The push by firms for less onerous and more business-friendly regulation has run up against environmental and social pressures/or more rigorous regulatory controls, as awareness grows ofthe risks ofnew technologies. The case of the Australian Food and Grocery Council (AFGC) illustrates the issues. The extent to which this association participates directly in the design and implementation of public policy is indicative of a decline in the autonomy of politicians and the state bureaucracy vis-a-vis the ideology and interests of business.
History
Journal
Labour and industry
Volume
12
Pagination
77-93
Location
Melbourne, Vic.
Open access
Yes
ISSN
1030-1763
Language
eng
Publication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice
2001
Issue
2
Publisher
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Centre for Workplace Culture Change