Deakin University
Browse
islam-covid19psych-2021.pdf (14.6 MB)

COVID-19: Factors associated with psychological distress, fear, and coping strategies among community members across 17 countries

Download (14.6 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2021-01-01, 00:00 authored by Aziz RahmanAziz Rahman, Shariful IslamShariful Islam, P Tungpunkom, F Sultana, S M Alif, B Banik, M Salehin, B Joseph, L Lam, M C Watts, S J Khan, S Ghozy, S Y Chair, W T Chien, C Schönfeldt-Lecuona, N El-Khazragy, I Mahmud, A H Al Mawali, T S Al Maskari, R J Alharbi, A Hamza, M A Keblawi, M Hammoud, A M Elaidy, A D Susanto, A S Bahar Moni, A A AlQurashi, A Ali, A Wazib, C S Sanluang, D H Elsori, F Yasmin, F F Taufik, M Al Kloub, M G Ruiz, M Elsayed, N K Eltewacy, N Al Laham, N Oli, R Abdelnaby, R Dweik, R Thongyu, S Almustanyir, S Rahman, S Nitayawan, S Al-Madhoun, S Inthong, T A Alharbi, T Bahar, T T Ginting, W M Cross
Abstract
Background
The current pandemic of COVID-19 impacted the psychological wellbeing of populations globally.

Objectives
We aimed to examine the extent and identify factors associated with psychological distress, fear of COVID-19 and coping.

Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional study across 17 countries during Jun-2020 to Jan-2021. Levels of psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale), fear of COVID-19 (Fear of COVID-19 Scale), and coping (Brief Resilient Coping Scale) were assessed.

Results
A total of 8,559 people participated; mean age (±SD) was 33(±13) years, 64% were females and 40% self-identified as frontline workers. More than two-thirds (69%) experienced moderate-to-very high levels of psychological distress, which was 46% in Thailand and 91% in Egypt. A quarter (24%) had high levels of fear of COVID-19, which was as low as 9% in Libya and as high as 38% in Bangladesh. More than half (57%) exhibited medium to high resilient coping; the lowest prevalence (3%) was reported in Australia and the highest (72%) in Syria. Being female (AOR 1.31 [95% CIs 1.09-1.57]), perceived distress due to change of employment status (1.56 [1.29-1.90]), comorbidity with mental health conditions (3.02 [1.20-7.60]) were associated with higher levels of psychological distress and fear. Doctors had higher psychological distress (1.43 [1.04-1.97]), but low levels of fear of COVID-19 (0.55 [0.41-0.76]); nurses had medium to high resilient coping (1.30 [1.03-1.65]).

Conclusions
The extent of psychological distress, fear of COVID-19 and coping varied by country; however, we identified few higher risk groups who were more vulnerable than others. There is an urgent need to prioritise health and well-being of those people through well-designed intervention that may need to be tailored to meet country specific requirements.

History

Journal

Globalization and Health

Volume

17

Issue

1

Article number

ARTN 117

Pagination

1 - 19

Publisher

BMC

Location

London,Eng

ISSN

1744-8603

eISSN

1744-8603

Language

English

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC