File(s) under permanent embargo
Capillary electrophoresis for the analysis of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins in shellfish: comparison of detection methods
journal contribution
posted on 2014-05-01, 00:00 authored by A S A Keyon, Rosanne GuijtRosanne Guijt, A Gaspar, A A Kazarian, P N Nesterenko, C J Bolch, M C BreadmoreParalytic shellfish toxins (PSTs) are produced by marine and freshwater microalgae and accumulate in shellfish including mussels, oysters, and scallops, causing possible fatalities when inadvertently consumed. Monitoring of PST content of shellfish is therefore important for food safety, with currently approved methods based on HPLC, using pre- or postcolumn oxidation for fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD). CE is an attractive alternative for screening and detection of PSTs as it is compatible with miniaturization and could be implemented in portable instrumentation for on-site monitoring. In this study, CE methods were developed for C4D, FLD, UV absorption detection, and MS—making this
first report of C4D and FLD for PSTs detection. Because most oxidized toxins are neutral, MEKC was used in combination with FLD. The developed CZE-UV and CZE-C4D methods provide better resolution, selectivity, and separation efficiency compared to CZE-MS and MEKC-FLD. The sensitivity of the CZE-C4D and MEKC-FLD methods was superior to UV and MS, with LOD values ranging from 140 to 715 ng/mL for CZE-C4D and 60.9 to 104 ng/mL for MEKC-FLD. With the regulatory limit for shellfish samples of 800 ng/mL, the CZE-C4D and MEKC-FLD methods were evaluated for the screening and detection of PSTs in shellfish samples. While the CZE-C4D method suffered from significant interferences from the shellfish matrix, MEKC-FLD was successfully used for PST screening of a periodate-oxidized mussel sample, with results confirmed by HPLC-FLD. This confirms the potential of MEKC-FLD for screening of PSTs in shellfish samples.
first report of C4D and FLD for PSTs detection. Because most oxidized toxins are neutral, MEKC was used in combination with FLD. The developed CZE-UV and CZE-C4D methods provide better resolution, selectivity, and separation efficiency compared to CZE-MS and MEKC-FLD. The sensitivity of the CZE-C4D and MEKC-FLD methods was superior to UV and MS, with LOD values ranging from 140 to 715 ng/mL for CZE-C4D and 60.9 to 104 ng/mL for MEKC-FLD. With the regulatory limit for shellfish samples of 800 ng/mL, the CZE-C4D and MEKC-FLD methods were evaluated for the screening and detection of PSTs in shellfish samples. While the CZE-C4D method suffered from significant interferences from the shellfish matrix, MEKC-FLD was successfully used for PST screening of a periodate-oxidized mussel sample, with results confirmed by HPLC-FLD. This confirms the potential of MEKC-FLD for screening of PSTs in shellfish samples.
History
Journal
ElectrophoresisVolume
35Issue
10Pagination
1496 - 1503Publisher
WileyLocation
Weinheim, GermanyPublisher DOI
ISSN
0173-0835Language
engPublication classification
C Journal article; C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2014, WileyUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Capacitively coupled contactless conductivityCEFluorescence detectionParalytic shellfish toxinsScience & TechnologyLife Sciences & BiomedicinePhysical SciencesBiochemical Research MethodsChemistry, AnalyticalBiochemistry & Molecular BiologyChemistryLIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHYSAXITOXIN ANALOGSMASS-SPECTROMETRYPRECHROMATOGRAPHIC OXIDATIONQUANTITATIVE-DETERMINATIONGYMNODINIUM-CATENATUMMUSSELSSCALLOPSOYSTERS
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC