Deakin University
Browse

Carnivore conservation needs evidence-based livestock protection

Download (2.1 MB)
Version 3 2024-06-18, 10:30
Version 2 2024-06-03, 15:06
Version 1 2018-10-03, 14:38
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-18, 10:30 authored by LM van Eeden, A Eklund, JRB Miller, JV López-Bao, G Chapron, MR Cejtin, MS Crowther, CR Dickman, J Frank, M Krofel, DW Macdonald, J McManus, TK Meyer, AD Middleton, TM Newsome, WJ Ripple, Euan RitchieEuan Ritchie, OJ Schmitz, KJ Stoner, M Tourani, A Treves
Carnivore predation on livestock often leads people to retaliate. Persecution by humans has contributed strongly to global endangerment of carnivores. Preventing livestock losses would help to achieve three goals common to many human societies: preserve nature, protect animal welfare, and safeguard human livelihoods. Between 2016 and 2018, four independent reviews evaluated >40 years of research on lethal and nonlethal interventions for reducing predation on livestock. From 114 studies, we find a striking conclusion: scarce quantitative comparisons of interventions and scarce comparisons against experimental controls preclude strong inference about the effectiveness of methods. For wise investment of public resources in protecting livestock and carnivores, evidence of effectiveness should be a prerequisite to policy making or large-scale funding of any method or, at a minimum, should be measured during implementation. An appropriate evidence base is needed, and we recommend a coalition of scientists and managers be formed to establish and encourage use of consistent standards in future experimental evaluations.

History

Journal

PLoS Biology

Volume

16

Article number

ARTN e2005577

Pagination

1 - 8

Location

United States

Open access

  • Yes

ISSN

1544-9173

eISSN

1545-7885

Language

English

Publication classification

C Journal article, C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2018, van Eeden et al.

Issue

9

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE