Chocolate unicorns and smiling teddy biscuits: analysis of the use of child-directed marketing on the packages of Australian foods
Version 2 2024-06-15, 20:15Version 2 2024-06-15, 20:15
Version 1 2023-11-20, 03:59Version 1 2023-11-20, 03:59
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-15, 20:15authored byAlexandra Jones, Maria Shahid, Georgia Morelli, Kylie Howes, Devorah Riesenberg, Kate SievertKate Sievert, Simone Pettigrew, Gary SacksGary Sacks
Abstract
Objective:
The use of food packaging as a vehicle for marketing to children is under investigated. Our objective was to determine the prevalence and types of child-directed promotional techniques used on food packaging in Australia.
Design:
Based on existing literature and regulations, we developed a framework to classify on-pack child-directed promotional techniques involving the use of characters and other elements that appeal to children. We analysed the packaging of all products in eight food categories available for sale from supermarkets in 2019 and recorded the use of child-directed promotions on pack. We assessed the number and proportion of products displaying child-directed promotional techniques overall and assessed the healthiness of products using child-directed promotions against four indicators of healthiness to provide summary data overall and for the manufacturers who most frequently employed child-targeted strategies.
Setting:
Data were collected from the FoodSwitch database in Sydney, Australia.
Results:
901/8006 (11·3 %) products displayed one or more child-directed on-pack element. Most frequent was on foods for infants and young children (n 315), confectionery (n 283), snack foods (n 172) and dairy (n 168). Personified characters were the most commonly used element (n 512). Products using child-directed promotional techniques scored poorly on all four indicators of healthiness: mean health star rating 2·34 (out of 5); 81 % ultra-processed and 6·1 % and 4·5 % products eligible to market to children under Western Pacific and Mexican nutrient profiling schemes, respectively.
Conclusions:
Australian children are targeted by promotional techniques on the packaging of unhealthy food products. Stronger regulation of these techniques is warranted to protect children’s health.