Deakin University
Browse
mcdonald-choosingresponse-2004.pdf (598.03 kB)

Choosing response scale labels and length: guidance for researchers and clients

Download (598.03 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2004-11-01, 00:00 authored by P Darbyshire, H McDonald
There has been much debate over the optimal format for scales, particularly in regard to two key issues - the labelling of points and the overall length of response scales. This paper reviews the evidence regarding the advantages of different scale types and lengths, and provides guidance as to what scale types suit different research objectives. Using a direct comparison of 400 responses on 5-point and 11 -point scales to the same question, by the same people, we examine some of the important differences previously found and then illustrate the impact they have on data quality and useability. Our conclusion, based on past research and our own analysis, is that longer, balanced and unlabelled scales offer the maximum flexibility and reliability in the majority of cases.

History

Journal

Australasian journal of market research

Volume

12

Issue

2

Pagination

17 - 26

Publisher

Australian Market & Social Research Society

Location

North Sydney, N.S.W.

ISSN

1325-4634

Language

eng

Notes

Reproduced with the specific permission of the copyright owner.

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2004 Australian Market & Social Research Society

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports