Clinical outcomes of interval training in cardiovascular disease populations: A clinical perspective

Nearly 20 years have elapsed since the first clinical trial investigated the impact of interval training on patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). This clinical corner discusses the health outcomes of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and appropriately powered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which have tested these interval training programs across various CVDs (i.e., coronary artery disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, peripheral arterial disease, and cardiac implantable electronic devices). The publications included in this clinical corner have shown that interval training leads to similar or superior improvements in V̇O2peak, functional capacity, pain free walking, QoL, anxiety, depression, and endothelial function, but the magnitude of improvements across varying protocols (e.g., length and number of work periods, intensities of work periods, duration of exercise sessions, frequency of exercise sessions, duration of program) and optimal dosage for males and females is unclear across CVD conditions. The heterogeneity in protocols, physical and mental health outcome measures, and lack of sex- and gender-based analyses calls for more high-quality research in this area.