tucker-codesigningin-inpress-2022.pdf (1.11 MB)
Co-designing in Australia housing for people with intellectual disability: an integrative literature review
journal contribution
posted on 2022-04-08, 00:00 authored by Richard TuckerRichard Tucker, Patsie Frawley, Mirjana LozanovskaMirjana Lozanovska, M PrainAbstract
Background
This paper provides an evidence base for practice in Australia from an integrative literature review of research on co-designing housing with people with an intellectual disability. The study asks: what methods and outcomes have been reported from including people with an intellectual disability in the co-design of their housing?
Method
The integrative review framework described by Whitemore and Knafl (2005) was used to analyse the literature.
Results
The literature searches yielded 16 articles after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Important gaps in the literature were found relating to: co-designing with people with an intellectual disability; the co-designing of housing with people with an intellectual disability; specific frameworks or benchmarks for co-designing with people with an intellectual disability; processes on use of proxies; and on design outcomes.
Conclusions
Considerable work is required to explore and evaluate co-design processes in the design of housing with adults with intellectual disabilities, as well as how the outcomes of these processes are evaluated.
Background
This paper provides an evidence base for practice in Australia from an integrative literature review of research on co-designing housing with people with an intellectual disability. The study asks: what methods and outcomes have been reported from including people with an intellectual disability in the co-design of their housing?
Method
The integrative review framework described by Whitemore and Knafl (2005) was used to analyse the literature.
Results
The literature searches yielded 16 articles after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Important gaps in the literature were found relating to: co-designing with people with an intellectual disability; the co-designing of housing with people with an intellectual disability; specific frameworks or benchmarks for co-designing with people with an intellectual disability; processes on use of proxies; and on design outcomes.
Conclusions
Considerable work is required to explore and evaluate co-design processes in the design of housing with adults with intellectual disabilities, as well as how the outcomes of these processes are evaluated.
History
Journal
Journal of Housing and the Built EnvironmentPagination
1 - 21Publisher
SpringerLocation
Berlin, GermanyPublisher DOI
Link to full text
ISSN
1566-4910eISSN
1573-7772Language
EnglishPublication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC