File(s) under permanent embargo
Cognitive enhancement, lifestyle choice or misuse of prescription drugs? : Ethics blind spots in current debates
journal contributionposted on 2010-04-01, 00:00 authored by E Racine, Cynthia ForliniCynthia Forlini
The prospects of enhancing cognitive or motor functions using neuroscience in otherwise healthy individuals has attracted considerable attention and interest in neuroethics (Farah et al., Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5:421-425, 2004; Glannon Journal of Medical Ethics 32:74-78, 2006). The use of stimulants is one of the areas which has propelled the discussion on the potential for neuroscience to yield cognition-enhancing products. However, we have found in our review of the literature that the paradigms used to discuss the non-medical use of stimulant drugs prescribed for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) vary considerably. In this brief communication, we identify three common paradigms-prescription drug abuse, cognitive enhancement, and lifestyle use of pharmaceuticals-and briefly highlight how divergences between paradigms create important "ethics blind spots". © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Pagination1 - 4
Publication classificationC1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice2008, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Social SciencesScience & TechnologyLife Sciences & BiomedicineEthicsMedical EthicsSocial Sciences, BiomedicalSocial Sciences - Other TopicsBiomedical Social SciencesNeuroethicsEnhancementPrescription drug misuseLifestyle drugsPublic healthILLICIT USESTIMULANT MEDICATIONCOLLEGE-STUDENTSUNDERGRADUATEPREVALENCEMOTIVESSAMPLE