File(s) under permanent embargo
Comparative investigation into the dynamic explicit and the static implicit method for springback of sheet metal stamping
journal contribution
posted on 1999-01-01, 00:00 authored by S W Lee, Jeong YoonJeong Yoon, D Y YangTwo kinds of time integration methods; the dynamic explicit method and the static implicit method, have been compared, especially with emphasis on the shell formulations and the stress integration methods. Two methods have been applied to the benchmark problem named the S-rail stamping process, provided by NUMISHEET'96 committee, in order to compare their numerical results with each other and with the average values of the experiments as well. Based on the comparisons, it is shown that both time integration methods can be successfully applied to industrial sheet metal stamping simulations. In detail, the static implicit method is advantageous over the dynamic explicit method in terms of accuracy, while the latter is known to be more efficient than the former in terms of computation efficiency.
History
Journal
Engineering computationsVolume
16Issue
3Pagination
347 - 373Publisher
Emerald Group PublishingLocation
Bingley, Eng.Publisher DOI
ISSN
0264-4401eISSN
1758-7077Language
engPublication classification
C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
1999, MCB University PressUsage metrics
Keywords
benchmarkingdeformationintegrationmappingspringbackScience & TechnologyTechnologyPhysical SciencesComputer Science, Interdisciplinary ApplicationsEngineering, MultidisciplinaryMathematics, Interdisciplinary ApplicationsMechanicsComputer ScienceEngineeringMathematicsPLANE-STRESS ELASTOPLASTICITYFORMING PROCESSESPLASTIC WORKFORMULATIONALGORITHMPATHSMechanical Engineering
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC