Comparing Australian commonwealth, state and territory budget balance numbers
journal contribution
posted on 2006-01-01, 00:00authored byGraeme Wines, Helen Scarborough
This article presents the findings from a case study of the 2004–05 annual budgets prepared by the Commonwealth, state and territory governments of Australia. The study examined the headline budget balance (general government sector surplus or deficit) announced in the budget papers and speeches of each of the nine governments. Findings indicate the adoption of varying measurement bases and a consequent lack of comparability in the headlined budget balance numbers. Accounting reforms have resulted in adoption of two different systems of accrual accounting by governments — the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) system and the professional Australian Accounting Standards (AAS) system — which provide significantly different measurements of the budget balance. However, there has been no prescription of the manner in which these alternative measures should be presented. This raises a number of questions from an accounting perspective.
History
Journal
Australian journal of public administration
Volume
65
Pagination
74 - 89
Location
Sydney, N.S.W.
ISSN
0313-6647
eISSN
1467-8500
Language
eng
Publication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice
2006, National Council of the Institute of Public Administration Australia