File(s) not publicly available
Comparing the feasibility, acceptability, clinical-, and cost-effectiveness of mental health e-screening to paper-based screening on the detection of depression, anxiety, and psychosocial risk in pregnant women: A study protocol of a randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial
Version 3 2024-06-19, 09:27
Version 2 2024-06-06, 01:17
Version 1 2022-10-30, 23:17
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-19, 09:27 authored by D Kingston, S McDonald, A Biringer, MP Austin, K Hegadoren, Rebecca GialloRebecca Giallo, A Ohinmaa, G Lasiuk, G MacQueen, W Sword, M Lane-Smith, SV van ZantenComparing the feasibility, acceptability, clinical-, and cost-effectiveness of mental health e-screening to paper-based screening on the detection of depression, anxiety, and psychosocial risk in pregnant women: A study protocol of a randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial
History
Journal
TrialsVolume
15Article number
ARTN 3Location
EnglandPublisher DOI
ISSN
1745-6215eISSN
1745-6215Language
EnglishPublication classification
C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalIssue
1Publisher
BIOMED CENTRAL LTDUsage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Science & TechnologyLife Sciences & BiomedicineMedicine, Research & ExperimentalResearch & Experimental MedicinePsychosocial assessmentOnlineScreeningPregnancyDepressionAnxietyStressRandomized controlled trialINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCEPOSTNATAL DEPRESSIONPOSTPARTUM DEPRESSIONPERINATAL DEPRESSIONCARE SETTINGSALPHA-FORMBARRIERSSCALEHELPINTERVENTIONS
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC