Deakin University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Comparison of the performance of ceramic microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes in the reclamation and reuse of secondary wastewater

Version 2 2024-06-03, 11:24
Version 1 2014-10-28, 10:17
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-03, 11:24 authored by S Muthukumaran, Bas BaskaranBas Baskaran
Advanced treatment of secondary wastewater generally has been achieved using polymeric microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes. Newly developed ceramic membranes offer distinctive advantages over the currently employed membranes and were recently introduced for the purpose. This paper presents results of a pilot study designed to investigate the application of ceramic microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) membranes in the recovery of water from secondary wastewater. Synthetic wastewater similar to the quality of secondary treated wastewater was fed to ceramic MF and UF system in a cross-flow mode. The filtration experiments revealed that the flux recovery through tubular ceramic MF membrane was more sensitive to the variation in TMP compared with the tubular ceramic UF membrane over the range of TMP studied. The resistance in series model was used for the evaluation of the resistance to the permeate flux. The results revealed that for ceramic UF membrane, the contribution to the total resistance of fouling was higher than the inherent of the clean membrane resistance. However, both the clean membrane resistance and the fouling resistance contribute equally in the case of MF membrane. Various wastewater indices were measured to evaluate the effectiveness of the filtration treatment. The ceramic UF membrane consistently met water quality in the permeate in terms of colour, turbidity, chemical oxygen demand and absorbance, suggesting that the permeate water could be made to be reused or recycled for suitable purposes. However, MF membrane appeared to be incompetent with respect to the removal of colour. The unified membrane fouling index (UMFI) was used to measure the fouling potential of both the membranes. The result showed that for UF membrane, the value of UMFI is one order of magnitude higher than MF membrane. The overall results suggest that there were significant differences in the performance of both the ceramic UF and MF membranes that are likely to impact on the operation and maintenance of the membrane system.

History

Journal

Desalination and water treatment

Volume

52

Pagination

670-677

Location

Hopkinton, Mass.

ISSN

1944-3994

eISSN

1944-3986

Language

eng

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal, C Journal article

Copyright notice

2014, Taylor & Francis

Issue

4-6

Publisher

Taylor & Francis