File(s) under permanent embargo
Compensation committees, CEO pay and firm performance
journal contribution
posted on 2019-10-01, 00:00 authored by Sutha KanapathippillaiSutha Kanapathippillai, Ferdinand Gul, Dessalegn Mihret, Mohammad MuttakinMohammad MuttakinWe examine whether compensation committee existence (CCX) and compensation committee effectiveness (CCE) are associated with CEO pay-performance alignment, using data drawn from a sample of Australian listed companies. We find that compensation committee existence and effectiveness are positively associated with CEO pay-performance alignment. Further, our results show that the relationships hold for the pre- and post-GFC (Global Financial Crisis) periods but not for the crisis period. This evidence supports the prospect theory argument that in times of macroeconomic crisis, uncontrollable factors external to the firm constitute a firm's reference point for making executive remuneration decisions. These results are robust to alternative measures of firm performance and CEO cash compensation as well as tests of endogeneity. Overall, our evidence suggests that compensation committees contribute to addressing agency problems pertinent to contemporary corporate governance practices.
History
Journal
Pacific-Basin finance journalVolume
57Article number
101187Pagination
1 - 17Publisher
ElsevierLocation
Amsterdam, The NetherlandsPublisher DOI
ISSN
0927-538XLanguage
engPublication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal; C Journal articleCopyright notice
2019, Elsevier B.V.Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Chief executive officerCompensation committeeCompensationGlobal financial crisisAgency theoryProspect theorySocial SciencesBusiness, FinanceBusiness & EconomicsCORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITYREMUNERATION COMMITTEESEXECUTIVE-COMPENSATIONBOARD CHARACTERISTICSCASH COMPENSATIONPROSPECT-THEORYPANEL-DATAGOVERNANCEQUALITYDISCLOSURE