File(s) under permanent embargo
Competititon can harm consumers
Duopolists selling differentiated products can generate less consumer surplus than a monopoly selling one of the products. In a Hotelling-type model where a monopoly supplies more than half of potential consumers, but not all, entry by a rival leads to a duopoly price that is higher than the monopoly price. Consumers in aggregate will be made worse off by such entry when the effect of the price increase outweighs the benefit of extra variety. When consumers have continuous demand functions and firms use two-part tariffs, duopoly can also result in lower aggregate consumer surplus than monopoly. © 2008 The Author Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
History
Journal
Australian economic papersVolume
47Pagination
264-271Location
Chichester, Eng.Publisher DOI
ISSN
0004-900XeISSN
1467-8454Language
engPublication classification
C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal, C Journal articleCopyright notice
2008, Blackwell Publishing LtdIssue
3Publisher
WileyUsage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC