Composite indices: rank robustness, statistical association, and redundancy
Version 2 2024-06-13, 08:33Version 2 2024-06-13, 08:33
Version 1 2014-10-28, 10:03Version 1 2014-10-28, 10:03
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-13, 08:33authored byJ Foster, M McGillivray, S Seth
This article evaluates the robustness of rankings obtained from composite indices that combine information from two or more components via a weighted sum. It examines the empirical prevalence of robust comparisons using the method proposed by Foster et al. (2010). Indices examined are the Human Development Index (HDI), the Index of Economic Freedom (IEF), and the Environmental Performance Index (EPI). Key theoretical results demonstrate links between the prevalence of robust comparisons, Kendall’s tau rank correlation coefficient, and statistical association across components. Implications for redundancy among index components are also examined.
History
Journal
Econometric reviews
Volume
32
Season
Special issue : Robustness in multidimensional wellbeing analysis
Pagination
35-56
Location
London, Eng.
ISSN
0747-4938
eISSN
1532-4168
Language
eng
Notes
This paper was also presented as a technical report as : Composite indices : rank robustness, statistical association and redundancy, Alfred Deakin Research Institute, Geelong, Vic., 2011.