Deakin University
Browse
abbott-constructvalidity-2020.pdf (544.44 kB)

Construct validity and reliability of the talent development environment questionnaire in caribbean youth track and field athletes

Download (544.44 kB)
Version 3 2024-06-18, 19:10
Version 2 2024-06-06, 06:17
Version 1 2020-01-31, 14:44
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-18, 19:10 authored by CE Thomas, Gavin AbbottGavin Abbott, PB Gastin, Luana MainLuana Main
© 2020 Thomas et al. Caribbean nations stand to benefit significantly from the potential insights that can be gained from the assessment of their athlete talent development environments; which in turn can lead to the formulation of evidence-based strategies and improvements to their sport development pathways. The principal aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the 25-item TDEQ-5 to determine its validity to assess the development environments of talented youth track and field athletes from six English-speaking Caribbean countries. As a secondary aim, we sought to examine athletes' perceptions of their talent development environment within this context. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed adequate model fit of a re-specified model and good overall internal reliability of the scale, therefore offering support for its use within this context. Furthermore, adequate construct validity and internal reliability was found within three subscales (i.e., communication, holistic quality preparation and support network) with subpar scores within two subscales (i.e., long-term development focus and alignment of expectations). Preliminary findings on athletes' perceptions of their environment revealed key strengths in coaches' long-term development focus and communication, however deficiencies were noted in the accessibility and availability of sport-related support and preparation of athletes. In conclusion, the re-specified TDEQ-5 with 25 items appears to be a reliable and valid measure within the Caribbean context. However, it is recommended that the scale be used with some caution with regard to the interpretation of results for the 'long-term development focus' and 'alignment of expectations' subscales.

History

Journal

PLoS ONE

Volume

15

Article number

ARTN e0227815

Pagination

1 - 15

Location

United States

Open access

  • Yes

ISSN

1932-6203

eISSN

1932-6203

Language

English

Publication classification

C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Issue

1

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC