Construct validity and reliability of the talent development environment questionnaire in caribbean youth track and field athletes
Version 3 2024-06-18, 19:10Version 3 2024-06-18, 19:10
Version 2 2024-06-06, 06:17Version 2 2024-06-06, 06:17
Version 1 2020-01-31, 14:44Version 1 2020-01-31, 14:44
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-18, 19:10 authored by CE Thomas, Gavin AbbottGavin Abbott, PB Gastin, Luana MainLuana Main© 2020 Thomas et al. Caribbean nations stand to benefit significantly from the potential insights that can be gained from the assessment of their athlete talent development environments; which in turn can lead to the formulation of evidence-based strategies and improvements to their sport development pathways. The principal aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the 25-item TDEQ-5 to determine its validity to assess the development environments of talented youth track and field athletes from six English-speaking Caribbean countries. As a secondary aim, we sought to examine athletes' perceptions of their talent development environment within this context. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed adequate model fit of a re-specified model and good overall internal reliability of the scale, therefore offering support for its use within this context. Furthermore, adequate construct validity and internal reliability was found within three subscales (i.e., communication, holistic quality preparation and support network) with subpar scores within two subscales (i.e., long-term development focus and alignment of expectations). Preliminary findings on athletes' perceptions of their environment revealed key strengths in coaches' long-term development focus and communication, however deficiencies were noted in the accessibility and availability of sport-related support and preparation of athletes. In conclusion, the re-specified TDEQ-5 with 25 items appears to be a reliable and valid measure within the Caribbean context. However, it is recommended that the scale be used with some caution with regard to the interpretation of results for the 'long-term development focus' and 'alignment of expectations' subscales.
History
Journal
PLoS ONEVolume
15Article number
ARTN e0227815Pagination
1 - 15Location
United StatesPublisher DOI
Open access
- Yes
Link to full text
ISSN
1932-6203eISSN
1932-6203Language
EnglishPublication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalIssue
1Publisher
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCEUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC