File(s) not publicly available
Core affect and subjective wellbeing: a rebuttal to Moum and Land
journal contribution
posted on 2007-12-01, 00:00 authored by Robert CumminsRobert Cummins, Mark StokesMark Stokes, Melanie DavernThis paper is a rebuttal to the reviews of Moum and Land. Publication has been facilitated by Journal policy (see Instructions to authors ‘Procedure when the authors and reviewers disagree’ on the Journal website) which details the procedure to be followed in the case of disputed manuscripts. Our reply is in two parts. The first concerns issues of theory and the second issues of methodology. Each point of critique raised by the reviewers has been answered and shown either to be false or irrelevant. We contend that our original conclusion still stands. Subjective wellbeing is dominated by Core Affect.
History
Journal
Journal of happiness studies: an interdisciplinary forum on subjective well-beingVolume
8Issue
4Pagination
457 - 466Publisher
Springer NetherlandsLocation
Dordrecht, NetherlandsPublisher DOI
ISSN
1389-4978eISSN
1573-7780Language
engPublication classification
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2007, Springer Science + Business Media BVUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedLicence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC