The literature offers various explanations to either support or refute the Ang et al. (2006) high idiosyncratic volatility low return puzzle. Fu (2009) finds a significantly positive contemporaneous relation between return and exponential generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic idiosyncratic volatility. We use corporate hedging to shed light on this puzzle. Conceptually, idiosyncratic volatility matters to investors who face limits to diversification. But limits to diversification become less relevant for firms that consistently hedge. We confirm the main finding in Fu (2009), but only for firms that do not consistently hedge. For firms that adopt a consistent hedging policy, idiosyncratic volatility, whether contemporaneous or lagged, is insignificant in Fama–MacBeth regressions, controlling for size, book-to-market, momentum, liquidity, and industry effects.
History
Journal
International Review of Finance
Volume
17
Pagination
395-425
Location
London, Eng.
ISSN
1369-412X
eISSN
1468-2443
Language
English
Publication classification
C Journal article, C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal