Deakin University
Browse

Correction to: Mapping PedsQL™ scores onto CHU9D utility scores: estimation, validation and a comparison of alternative instrument versions

Download (346.66 kB)
Version 2 2024-06-03, 12:26
Version 1 2020-02-07, 14:00
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-03, 12:26 authored by R Sweeney, G Chen, Lisa GoldLisa Gold, F Mensah, M Wake
In the original publication of the article, the equation CHU9DPredicted = exp(BETAPredicted)/(1 + exp(BETA Predicted)) was formatted incorrectly under Model 2. The correct version is provided below: Model 2—assuming a 15-year-old female with a score of 50 in each functioning dimension: The original article has been corrected. BETAPredicted = 1.611745 − 4.724501 * (Physical Functioning) + 2.447472 * (Emotional Functioning) + 0.9967647 * (School Functioning) + 4.144465 * (Physical Functioning)2 + 0.1686639 * (Male) − 0.1198546 * (Age) CHU9DPredicted = exp(BETAPredicted)∕(1 + exp(BETAPredicted)) → BETAPredicted = 1.611745 − 4.724501 * (50∕100) + 2.447472 * (50∕100) + 0.9967647 * (50∕100) + 4.144465 * (50∕100)2 + 0.1686639 * 0 − 0.1198546 * 15 = 0.20991 → CHU9DPredicted = exp (0.20991)∕ (1 + exp (0.20991)) = 0.55 The original article has been corrected.

History

Journal

Quality of Life Research

Volume

29

Pagination

653-653

Location

Dordrecht, Netherlands

Open access

  • Yes

ISSN

0962-9343

eISSN

1573-2649

Language

eng

Notes

(Quality of Life Research, (2020), 29, 3, (639-652), 10.1007/s11136-019-02357-9)

Publication classification

C4 Letter or note

Copyright notice

2020, Springer Nature Switzerland

Issue

3

Publisher

Springer Nature

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC