Corrigendum to "Undergraduate nursing students' performance in recognising and responding to sudden patient deterioration in high psychological fidelity simulated environments: An Australian multi-centre study" [Nurse Educ. Today 34(5) (May 2014) 691-696].
Version 2 2024-06-05, 08:25Version 2 2024-06-05, 08:25
Version 1 2016-01-15, 11:51Version 1 2016-01-15, 11:51
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-05, 08:25authored byF Bogossian, S Cooper, R Cant, A Beauchamp, J Porter, V Kain, Tracey BucknallTracey Bucknall, Nikki PhillipsNikki Phillips, L McKenna, L Kinsmen, R Endacott, B Devries, H Forbes, R Hill, K Missen
The authors regret that the original text: The SAGAT instrument has been previously validated (Bell et al., 2006) is incorrect and should read: The SAGAT technique has been demonstrated as valid, sensitive and reliable measure of situation awareness in diverse applications (Endsley, 2000).
Endsley, M. R. (2000) Direct measurement of situation awareness: Validity and use of SAGAT. In Endsley, M.R. & Garland, D.J. (Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement (pp 147–173). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.