Deakin University
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Corrigendum to "Undergraduate nursing students' performance in recognising and responding to sudden patient deterioration in high psychological fidelity simulated environments: An Australian multi-centre study" [Nurse Educ. Today 34(5) (May 2014) 691-696].

Version 2 2024-06-05, 08:25
Version 1 2016-01-15, 11:51
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-05, 08:25 authored by F Bogossian, S Cooper, R Cant, A Beauchamp, J Porter, V Kain, Tracey BucknallTracey Bucknall, Nikki PhillipsNikki Phillips, L McKenna, L Kinsmen, R Endacott, B Devries, H Forbes, R Hill, K Missen
The authors regret that the original text: The SAGAT instrument has been previously validated (Bell et al., 2006) is incorrect and should read: The SAGAT technique has been demonstrated as valid, sensitive and reliable measure of situation awareness in diverse applications (Endsley, 2000). Endsley, M. R. (2000) Direct measurement of situation awareness: Validity and use of SAGAT. In Endsley, M.R. & Garland, D.J. (Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement (pp 147–173). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

History

Journal

Nurse education today

Volume

38

Pagination

154-154

Location

Amsterdam, The Netherlands

eISSN

1532-2793

Language

eng

Publication classification

CN Other journal article

Copyright notice

2016, Elsevier

Publisher

Elsevier

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC