File(s) under permanent embargo
Cut points for identifying clinically significant diabetes distress in adolescents with type 1 diabetes using the PAID-T: Results from diabetes MILES youth-Australia
journal contribution
posted on 2017-11-01, 00:00 authored by Virginia HaggerVirginia Hagger, Christel HendrieckxChristel Hendrieckx, F Cameron, F Pouwer, T C Skinner, Jane SpeightJane SpeightOBJECTIVE: To establish cut point(s) for the Problem Areas in Diabetes-Teens (PAID-T) scale to identify adolescents with clinically meaningful, elevated diabetes distress. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were available from the Diabetes Management and Impact for Long-term Empowerment and Success (MILES) Youth-Australia Study, a national survey assessing various psychosocial indicators among self-selected National Diabetes Services Scheme registrants. Participants in the current study (n = 537) were (mean ± SD) 16 ± 2 years old, had type 1 diabetes for 6 ± 4 years, and 62% (n = 334) were girls. They completed measures of diabetes distress (PAID-T) and depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire for Adolescents) and self-reported their most recent HbA1c and frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Relationships between the PAID-T and the psychological and clinical variables were examined to identify a clinically meaningful threshold for elevated diabetes distress. ANOVAs were used to test whether these variables differed by levels of distress. RESULTS: Two cut points distinguished none-to-mild (<70), moderate (70-90), and high (>90) diabetes distress. Moderate distress was experienced by 18% of adolescents and high distress by 36%. Mean depressive symptoms, self-reported HbA1c, and SMBG differed significantly across the three levels of diabetes distress (all P < 0.001), with moderate-to-large effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Using the PAID-T, this study defined two clinically meaningful cut points to distinguish none-to-mild, moderate, and high diabetes distress in adolescents (aged 13-19). Based on these cut points, most respondents experienced at least moderate diabetes distress, which was clinically significant. Establishing thresholds for elevated diabetes distress will aid clinicians and researchers to interpret PAID-T scores, prompt discussion and intervention for those with unmet needs, and enable the effectiveness of interventions to be evaluated.
History
Journal
Diabetes careVolume
40Issue
11Pagination
1462 - 1468Publisher
American Diabetes AssociationLocation
Arlington, Va.Publisher DOI
ISSN
0149-5992eISSN
1935-5548Language
engPublication classification
C Journal article; C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journalCopyright notice
2017, The American Diabetes AssociationUsage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC