Determinants of self-handicapping strategies in sport and their effects on athletic performance
Version 2 2024-06-04, 07:18Version 2 2024-06-04, 07:18
Version 1 2016-03-14, 10:58Version 1 2016-03-14, 10:58
journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-04, 07:18authored byGR Coudevylle, KA Martin Ginis, JP Famose, I Greenlees, Ralph MaddisonRalph Maddison, KK Vierling
The purpose of this study was to examine self-efficacy and self-esteem as predictors of claimed and behavioral self-handicapping, and to compare the relationship between behavioral and claimed self-handicaps and athletic performance. A total of 31 basketball players participated in
the study. Claimed self-handicaps were significantly negatively correlated with selfesteem whereas behavioral self-handicapping was significantly negatively correlated with self-efficacy. Performance was negatively correlated with behavioral self-handicapping, but was not correlated with claimed
self-handicapping. These findings reinforce the conceptual distinction between claimed and behavioral self-handicaps by demonstrating that the two strategies are indeed related to different factors and that they have different consequences for performance.
History
Journal
Social Behavior and Personality
Volume
36
Pagination
391-398
ISSN
0301-2212
Language
English
Publication classification
C Journal article, C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal