File(s) under permanent embargo

Deterrence policies and asylum seekers: the case of Australia

journal contribution
posted on 2014-01-01, 00:00 authored by L Effeney, Fethi MansouriFethi Mansouri
The basic tenets of the international refugee protection regime, set out in the UN's 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol, grant individuals the right to seek asylum, but do not provide for laws obliging signatory states to grant asylum. This inherent paradox allows signatory states ongoing manoeuvre to prevent would-be asylum seekers from accessing protection in their territories. To this end, countries of the global north have designed and implemented a range of measures aimed at deterring onshore asylum seekers - privileging border control over refugee protection. This paper examines the effectiveness of deterrence measures taken by Australia. It argues that deterrence measures and attendant political rhetoric are not only contrary to international humanitarian obligations, but obscure empirically grounded understandings of forced migration as a complex social phenomenon, and as such are problematic in terms of meeting their publicly stated objectives of stopping on-shore asylum seeking in the long term.

History

Journal

International journal of migration and border studies

Volume

1

Issue

2

Pagination

217 - 230

Publisher

Inderscience Publishers

Location

Olney, Eng.

ISSN

1755-2419

eISSN

1755-2427

Language

eng

Publication classification

C Journal article; C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Copyright notice

2014, Inderscience

Usage metrics

Categories

Keywords

Exports