Deakin University
Browse

Diagnostic conversations: Clinical Decision Making in surgery – Part 2

Download (611.67 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2014-06-01, 00:00 authored by David WattersDavid Watters, Spencer Wynyard Beasley, Wendy Crebbin
Proceduralists who fail to review their decision making are unlikely to learn from their experiences, irrespective of whether the operative outcome is successful or not. Teaching junior surgeons to develop ‘insight’ into their own decision making has long been a challenge. Surgeons and staff of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons worked together to develop a model to help explain the processes around clinical decision making and incorporated this model into a Clinical Decision Making (CDM) training course. In this course, faculty apply the model to specific surgical cases, within the model’s framework of how clinical decisions are made; thus providing an opportunity to identify specific decision making processes as they occur and to highlight some of the learning opportunities they provide. The conversation in this paper illustrates the kinds of case-based interactions which typically occur in the development and teaching of the CDM course.The focus in this, the second of two papers, is on reviewing post-operative clinical decisions made in relation to one case, to improve the quality of subsequent decision making.

History

Journal

Diagnosis

Volume

1

Pagination

189-193

Location

Berlin, Germany

Open access

  • Yes

ISSN

2194-8011

eISSN

2194-802X

Language

eng

Publication classification

C2 Other contribution to refereed journal

Copyright notice

2014, The Authors

Issue

2

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC